Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. S.L. Messer


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00050-EKD-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000129127]. Mailed to: Kevin Snodgrass Jr. RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000. [17-6360]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6360 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6360 KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S.L. MESSER; M.L. COUNTS, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP; C. BISHOP, C/O at ROSP; E.R. BARKSDALE, Warden at ROSP; J. BENTLEY, Investigator at ROSP; JOE FANNIN, Lieutenant at ROSP; TORI RAIFORD, Unit Manager at ROSP; GARRY A. ADAMS, Lieutenant at ROSP; HAROLD CLARK, Director of VA. DOC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00050-EKD-RSB) Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6360 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Snodgrass v. Messer, No. 7:16-cv-00050-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?