Terrance Pevie v. John Wolfe


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000062891-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03271-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000147606]. Mailed to: Terrance Pevie EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 30420 Revells Neck Road Westover, MD 21890-0000. [17-6367]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6367 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6367 TERRANCE PEVIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN WOLFE, Warden (J.C.I.); LA’TRICIA TAYLOR, Correctional Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03271-TDC) Submitted: August 16, 2017 Decided: August 31, 2017 Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance Pevie, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6367 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Terrance Pevie, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pevie v. Wolfe, No. 8:15-cv-03271TDC (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2017). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?