Terrance Pevie v. John Wolfe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000062891-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03271-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000147606]. Mailed to: Terrance Pevie EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 30420 Revells Neck Road Westover, MD 21890-0000. [17-6367]
Appeal: 17-6367
Doc: 17
Filed: 08/31/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6367
TERRANCE PEVIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN WOLFE, Warden (J.C.I.); LA’TRICIA TAYLOR, Correctional Hearing
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03271-TDC)
Submitted: August 16, 2017
Decided: August 31, 2017
Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Pevie, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6367
Doc: 17
Filed: 08/31/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Pevie, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting the
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pevie v. Wolfe, No. 8:15-cv-03271TDC (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2017). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?