US v. Dave Taylor
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000060634-2] Originating case number: 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Dave Taylor. [17-6388]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)
Submitted: July 18, 2017
Decided: August 9, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Katherine Lee Martin, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Heather Hart
Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia;
Michael Arlen Jagels, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order construing his second
motion to reduce sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Guidelines as a motion to
reconsider and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2017). We deny
Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?