US v. Dave Taylor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000060634-2] Originating case number: 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000133654]. Mailed to: Dave Taylor. [17-6388]

Appeal: 17-6388

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/09/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)

Submitted: July 18, 2017

Decided: August 9, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Katherine Lee Martin, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Heather Hart
Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia;
Michael Arlen Jagels, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6388

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/09/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order construing his second
motion to reduce sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Guidelines as a motion to
reconsider and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2017). We deny
Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2