My'Ka El v. R. Reese
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for restraining order and to appoint/assign counsel [1000063880-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: My-Ka El. [17-6397]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
R. REESE, Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; M. SULLIVAN,
Officer; S. SELOGY, Officer; FNU MEYERS, Officer; FNU AGAPE, Officer; K.
S. KODAD, Officer; FNU ISSAC, Officer; FNU AIRTONE, Lieutenant;
S. MOBLEY; T. MOORE; T. WILSON; J. FLETCHER, Officer; J. PARKER; P.
MOORE; L.B. DIGGS; B. BUTLER; NURSE FNU GREEN, Sergeant; M. W.
WOMBLE; M. T. RETORT; B. SCAREY; T. CASTANO; FNU STOUTS,
Sergeant; R. MONROE; J. H. FRISON; R. BURNETT; BRADON JOLLY, North
Carolina State Trooper; W. L. CANTER; COOPER JERRELL, Mecklenburg
County Sheriff; FNU EASON; FNU STREET, Sergeant; FNU GANT, Sergeant;
FNU HOOD, Officer; R. CHAPMAN, Mecklenburg County Magistrate,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK)
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Decided: August 1, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
My’Ka El appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the
appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. El v. Reese, 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C.
Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017). We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?