My'Ka El v. R. Reese

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for restraining order and to appoint/assign counsel [1000063880-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000128875]. Mailed to: My-Ka El. [17-6397]

Appeal: 17-6397

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6397

MY’KA EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. REESE, Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; M. SULLIVAN,
Officer; S. SELOGY, Officer; FNU MEYERS, Officer; FNU AGAPE, Officer; K.
S. KODAD, Officer; FNU ISSAC, Officer; FNU AIRTONE, Lieutenant;
S. MOBLEY; T. MOORE; T. WILSON; J. FLETCHER, Officer; J. PARKER; P.
MOORE; L.B. DIGGS; B. BUTLER; NURSE FNU GREEN, Sergeant; M. W.
WOMBLE; M. T. RETORT; B. SCAREY; T. CASTANO; FNU STOUTS,
Sergeant; R. MONROE; J. H. FRISON; R. BURNETT; BRADON JOLLY, North
Carolina State Trooper; W. L. CANTER; COOPER JERRELL, Mecklenburg
County Sheriff; FNU EASON; FNU STREET, Sergeant; FNU GANT, Sergeant;
FNU HOOD, Officer; R. CHAPMAN, Mecklenburg County Magistrate,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Appeal: 17-6397

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-6397

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
My’Ka El appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the
appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. El v. Reese, 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C.
Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017). We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3