US v. Rashundria Burke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:10-cr-00296-HMH-11. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000124540]. Mailed to: Rashundria Burkes. [17-6399]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6399 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6399 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RASHUNDRIA J. BURKES, a/k/a Roe, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:10-cr-00296-HMH-11) Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 25, 2017 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rashundria J. Burkes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Andrew Burke Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina; Mark C. Moore, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6399 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rashundria J. Burkes appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burkes, No. 6:10-cr-00296-HMH-11 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?