Theodus Lindsay, Jr. v. William Glick, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--Motion to appoint/assign counsel is denied [1000058855-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00596-LCB-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000143818]. Mailed to: Theodus Lindsay. [17-6400]

Appeal: 17-6400

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/25/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6400

THEODUS LINDSAY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM GLICK, III; MR. BRANDHORST; MS. BARRINGER; CORDELIA
MCBRIDE; EBONY RATLIFF; MR. HILDRETH; MR. HUNEYCUTT; MS.
ROBINSON; MR. LOOKABILL; MS. BRUTON; MR. PARSONS; MR.
HARGRAVE; MR. BRADFORD; MACRE CRIDER; VICTOR LOCKLEAR;
MONICA BOND,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00596-LCB-JLW)

Submitted: August 15, 2017

Decided: August 25, 2017

Before SHEDD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodus Lindsay, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tammera Sudderth Hill, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6400

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/25/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Theodus Lindsay, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Lindsay’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Lindsay v. Glick, No. 1:15-cv-00596-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C.
Mar. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2