Walter Booker v. R. Timmon
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [1000154224-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: W Booker. [17-6402]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WALTER D. BOOKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager; B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant; T. ROBINSON,
Sergeant; G. D. FAULCON, Sergeant; LIEUTENANT TAYLOR; M. L. ROOK,
Defendants - Appellees,
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations; WENDY S. HOBBS,
Regional Administrator; EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden; C. PARKER,
Warden; J. HARRIS, Warden; C. BOONE, Regional Ombudsman; S. TAPP,
Human Rights Advocate; K. WHITEHEAD, Grievance Coordinator; L. GOODE,
Unit Manager; D. DUGGER, Institutional Hearings Officer,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Decided: October 2, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter D. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney
General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Walter D. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint
raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Religious Land Use and
Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012), and state law. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Timmons, No. 1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD
(E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2014; July 14, 2015; Feb. 14, 2017). We deny the motion for
injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?