US v. Marion Anderson


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:98-cr-00262-WMN-5. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000139840]. Mailed to: Marion Shawn Anderson. [17-6412]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6412 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/18/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARION SHAWN ANDERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00262-WMN-5) Submitted: August 9, 2017 Decided: August 18, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marion Shawn Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6412 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/18/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Marion Shawn Anderson has filed a duplicative notice of appeal from his September 29, 2000 criminal judgment. We previously dismissed Anderson’s first notice of appeal under 4th Cir. R. 45. See United States v. Anderson, No. 00-4734 (4th Cir. Nov. 30, 2000) (unpublished order). Anderson’s second notice of appeal was dismissed as untimely. United States v. Anderson, 22 F. App’x 309 (4th Cir. 2001) (No. 01-4518). Because this is Anderson’s third notice of appeal from the same criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?