Kiias Stockton v. Warden FCI Williamsburg


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000058702-2] Originating case number: 4:16-cv-01393-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000139854]. Mailed to: Stockton. [17-6414]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6414 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/18/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6414 KIIAS STOCKTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondent - Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBOP, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:16-cv-01393-TLW) Submitted: July 31, 2017 Decided: August 18, 2017 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kiias Stockton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 17-6414 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/18/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6414 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/18/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Kiias Stockton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stockton v. Warden FCI Williamsburg, No. 4:16-cv-01393-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?