Maurice Proctor v. J.F. Andrew
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000065817-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02166-D Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000165350]. Mailed to: Maurice Cortez Proctor Sr. [17-6450]
Appeal: 17-6450
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6450
MAURICE PROCTOR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J.F. ANDREWS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02166-D)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Cortez Proctor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Russell Pender, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6450
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Cortez Proctor, Sr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Proctor v. Andrews, No.
5:15-hc-02166-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?