Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to amend/correct [1000063887-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Richard Montgomery UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON P. O. Box 2000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525-2000. [17-6451]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner - Appellant,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA)
Submitted: August 9, 2017
Decided: August 24, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Richard Montgomery, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Montgomery’s motion to amend his informal brief, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Coakley, No. 3:16-cv00056-GMG-MJA) (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?