Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to amend/correct [1000063887-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000143007]. Mailed to: Richard Montgomery UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON P. O. Box 2000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525-2000. [17-6451]

Appeal: 17-6451

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6451

RICHARD MONTGOMERY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: August 9, 2017

Decided: August 24, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6451

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richard Montgomery, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Montgomery’s motion to amend his informal brief, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Coakley, No. 3:16-cv00056-GMG-MJA) (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2