US v. David Huggard
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000067925-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000124499]. Mailed to: D. Huggard. [17-6457]
Appeal: 17-6457
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/25/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6457
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID L. HUGGARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 25, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Huggard, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney,
Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6457
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/25/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David L. Huggard appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
judicial recusal and the production of documents. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Huggard, No. 1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2017). We deny
Huggard’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?