US v. Monte Winston


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:99-cr-00030-REP-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000144773]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6470]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6470 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6470 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00030-REP-1) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 28, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6470 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Monte Decarlos Winston appeals the district court’s order denying Winston’s postjudgment motion asking the court to audit his federal sentencing obligation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Winston, No. 3:99-cr-00030-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?