Mark Konsavich v. Meek


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000081439-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01829-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000128929]. Mailed to: M Konsavich. [17-6485]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6485 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/01/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6485 MARK JAMES KONSAVICH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01829-RBH) Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark James Konsavich, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6485 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/01/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mark James Konsavich appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Konsavich leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Konsavich v. Meeks, No. 1:16-cv-01829-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?