Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Paul Thompson, Jr. [17-6504]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC; DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional
Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Contractor with VDOC to operate and
manage LVCC employees and staff to provide medical care to plaintiff; E.
WRIGHT, Warden at LVCC; SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (female);
SHAW, Assistant Warden at LVCC (male); FANT, Unit Manager of Building #50
and the Therapeutic Community Program of Addictions Treatment; DAVIS, Unit
Manager for Building #70; GRAVES, Unit Manager of Segregation; BOONE,
Supervisor of Segregation; GOODE, Health Services Administrator of the LVCC
Medical Department; KELLY, Law Library at LVCC; NURSE LUCY, Nurse;
UNKNOWN MEDICAL STAFF TO BE NAMED LATER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thompson v. Clarke, No. 2:14-cv-00086-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?