Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motions to appoint/assign counsel [1000159487-2], [1000146000-2] denied. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000161686]. Mailed to: Keith Bryan Webb. [17-6555]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6555 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/26/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6555 KEITH BRYAN WEBB, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STEVEN FIGIEL, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee, and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT) Submitted: August 15, 2017 Decided: September 26, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Bryan Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Appeal: 17-6555 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/26/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6555 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/26/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Keith Bryan Webb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Figiel, No. 5:16-cv-00044FPS-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2017). We deny Webb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?