US v. Andrew Danzell


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:05-cr-00024-GEC-MFU-1, 7:09-cv-80196-GEC-MFU. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000165344]. Mailed to: Andrew J. Danzell. [17-6572]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6572 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6572 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW J. DANZELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:05-cr-00024-GEC-MFU-1; 7:09-cv-80196GEC-MFU) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew J. Danzell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6572 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Andrew J. Danzell appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Danzell, Nos. 7:05cr-00024-GEC-MFU-1; 7:09-cv-80196-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?