US v. George Crane, V

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000095836-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00297-LO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000141288]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6612]

Appeal: 17-6612

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6612

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE WASHINGTON CRANE, V,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00297-LO-1)

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Washington Crane, V, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6612

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
George Washington Crane, V, appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

See United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017).

Accordingly, we deny Crane’s motion to expedite and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Crane, No. 1:13-cr-00297-LO-1 (E.D. Va. May 1, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2