US v. George Crane, V


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000095836-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00297-LO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000141288]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6612]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6612 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6612 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GEORGE WASHINGTON CRANE, V, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00297-LO-1) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 22, 2017 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Washington Crane, V, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6612 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: George Washington Crane, V, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no See United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we deny Crane’s motion to expedite and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crane, No. 1:13-cr-00297-LO-1 (E.D. Va. May 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?