Richard Beall, Jr. v. Gov. Lawrence Hogan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000088689-2] Originating case number: 8:17-cv-00340-GJH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000128891]. Mailed to: Richard Beall, Jr.. [17-6626]

Appeal: 17-6626

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6626

RICHARD HOWARD BEALL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR LAWRENCE HOGAN; 2 EAST STAFF; PAUL VINCE; TOM
LEWIS; DIRECTOR ROBINSON; ADAM HOCKNER, Witness Defendant;
JENAVIVE; PETER IKE; PETER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00340-GJH)

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Howard Beall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6626

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richard Howard Beall, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the
court’s prior order directing him to file an amended complaint particularizing his claims.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Beall v. Hogan, No. 8:17-cv-00340-GJH (D. Md.
filed May 2, 2017 & entered May 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2