US v. Eric Richardson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00288-JKB-28. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000128824]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6636]

Appeal: 17-6636

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6636

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC RICHARDSON, a/k/a Father,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00288-JKB-28)

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6636

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/01/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eric Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to
recuse the district judge in his pending habeas proceedings. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Richardson seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2