US v. Jeffrey A. Martinovich

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00101-AWA-RJK-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000187926]. Mailed to: Jeffrey A. Martinovich. [17-6651, 17-6652]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6651 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/07/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6651 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH, Defendant - Appellant. No. 17-6652 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00101-AWA-RJK-1; 4:15-cr-00050-AWA-LRL-1) Submitted: October 30, 2017 Decided: November 7, 2017 Appeal: 17-6651 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/07/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey A. Martinovich, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Kevin Patrick Hudson, Brian James Samuels, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6651 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/07/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey A. Martinovich appeals the district court’s orders correcting his restitution orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martinovich, Nos. 4:12-cr-00101-AWA-RJK-1; 4:15-cr-00050-AWA-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2017; Apr. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?