Nathanael Reynolds v. State of South Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:17-cv-00298-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000166671].. [17-6663, 17-6759]

Appeal: 17-6663

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6663

NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6759

NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF CHARLESTON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00298-BHH; 2:17-cv-00681BHH)

Appeal: 17-6663

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Submitted: September 28, 2017

Decided: October 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-6663

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying his motion for
reconsideration. *

We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. South
Carolina, Nos. 4:17-cv-00298-BHH; 2:17-cv-00681-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 2017; May
16, 2017; June 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Reynolds moved for reconsideration in only one of the two cases.

3