Antonio Rhodes v. A. Mansukhani

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000099953-2]. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-02741-HMH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000161772]. Mailed to: Antonio Rhodes. [17-6665]

Appeal: 17-6665

Doc: 9

Filed: 09/26/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6665

ANTONIO RHODES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A. MANSUKHANI,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02741-HMH)

Submitted: September 12, 2017

Decided: September 26, 2017

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6665

Doc: 9

Filed: 09/26/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio Rhodes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rhodes v.
Mansukhani, No. 8:16-cv-02741-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2