Antonio Rhodes v. A. Mansukhani
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000099953-2]. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-02741-HMH. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Antonio Rhodes. [17-6665]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner - Appellant,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02741-HMH)
Submitted: September 12, 2017
Decided: September 26, 2017
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Antonio Rhodes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rhodes v.
Mansukhani, No. 8:16-cv-02741-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?