US v. Elizabeth Rushing
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000166487]. Mailed to: Elizabeth Rushing. [17-6666]
Appeal: 17-6666
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6666
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ELIZABETH MARIE RUSHING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elizabeth Marie Rushing-Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United
States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; William A. Brafford, Jonathan Henry Ferry,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Tiffany Mallory Moore, Jennifer A.
Youngs, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6666
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Rushing appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Rushing, No. 3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?