US v. William Barrow

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [1000097620-2] Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00029-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000141592]. Mailed to: William Barrow. [17-6670]

Appeal: 17-6670

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM DONNELL BARROW,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (2:11-cr-00029-D-1)

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Donnell Barrow, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron, Denise Walker,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6670

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Donnell Barrow appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. * We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Barrow, No. 2:11-cr-00029-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2017).

We deny Barrow’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The district court’s order also denies Barrow’s motion for review of his case for
harmless and plain error. Barrow confines his appeal to the district court’s denial of his
§ 3582(c)(2) motion.

2