Daniel Rose v. M. Colston Jone

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000163423]. Mailed to: Daniel Rose. [17-6675]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6675 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6675 DANIEL ROSE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. COLSTON JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; KATHLEEN A. ORTIZ, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6675 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Rose appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rose v. Jones, No. 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. filed May 15, 2017, entered May 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?