Leo Edward Brisbane v. Foodlion, LLC


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for costs [1000139220-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00989-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000145758]. Mailed to: Leo Edward Brisbane. [17-6687]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6687 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/29/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6687 LEO EDWARD BRISBANE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00989-JFM) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leo Edward Brisbane, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6687 Doc: 18 Filed: 08/29/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Leo Edward Brisbane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brisbane v. Food Lion, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00989-JFM (D. Md. May 5, 2017). We also deny Brisbane’s motion for costs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?