Michael Breyan v. Cynthia Ruth
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:17-cv-00110-BHH-MGB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000176660]. Mailed to: Michael Breyan. [17-6703, 17-6704, 17-6705, 17-6706]
Appeal: 17-6703
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/19/2017
Pg: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6703
MICHAEL A. BREYAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CYNTHIA RUTH; LT STORY; CAPTAIN AW BRADSHAW; AW KENNETH
SHARP; WARDEN GREGORY T KNOWLIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 17-6704
MICHAEL A. BREYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT EDDY ALL; LT HARRY; AW MAJOR BERRY; WARDEN L
CARTHEDGE; CAPTAIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal: 17-6703
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/19/2017
Pg: 2 of 4
No. 17-6705
MICHAEL A. BREYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER POINDEXTER; WILLIAM CLINE; ANDREW ROCKEFELLA;
SHEIK JOHNSON; WARREN STREETY; SGT FLOYD; ROBERT VELEQUEZ;
AW KNOWLIN; WARDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 17-6706
MICHAEL A. BREYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLASSIFICATION, regarding jail credits,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00110-BHH-MGB; 2:17-cv00111-BHH-MGB; 2:17-cv-00210-BHH-MGB; 2:17-cv-00664-BHH-MGB)
Submitted: October 17, 2017
Decided: October 19, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
2
Appeal: 17-6703
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/19/2017
Pg: 3 of 4
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3
Appeal: 17-6703
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/19/2017
Pg: 4 of 4
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael Breyan challenges the district court’s
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints without prejudice for failure to
comply with multiple court orders directing him to file his complaints on the proper
provided forms. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Having determined that these orders are final
and appealable, see Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir.
2015), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breyan v. Ruth, No. 2:17cv-00110-BHH-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. All; No. 2:17-cv-00111-BHHMGB (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. Poindexter, No. 2:17-cv-00210-BHH-MGB
(D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. Classification, No. 2:17-cv-00664-BHH-MGB (D.S.C.
Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?