Kenny Sowell v. William Brightharp

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-01500-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000141413]. Mailed to: Kenny Sowell; Kevin Michael DeAntonio. [17-6725]

Appeal: 17-6725

Doc: 12

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6725

KENNY SOWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOSEPH MCFADDEN; JAMES BLACKWELL; CAPTAIN MCBRIDE,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:16-cv-01500-DCN)

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenny Sowell, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael DeAntonio, Christopher Thomas
Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6725

Doc: 12

Filed: 08/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kenny Sowell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Sowell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Sowell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

See

Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2