Steve Lester v. SCDOC "Perry"
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000114952-2] Originating case number: 4:16-cv-03829-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Steve Lester PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 430 Oaklawn Road Pelzer, SC 29669-0000. [17-6751]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL “PERRY”; CAPT.
RANDALL; OFC. FISH; OFC. ALEWINE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (4:16-cv-03829-TMC)
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Lester, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lester’s
motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v.
SCDOC Perry, No. 4:16-cv-03829-TMC (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?