US v. Helen Anderson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cr-00040-HMH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000166627]. Mailed to: Helen Jean Anderson. [17-6785]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6785 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6785 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HELEN JEAN ANDERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:14-cr-00040-HMH-1) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Helen Jean Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6785 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Helen Jean Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 8:14-cr-00040-HMH-1 (D.S.C. May 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?