Adrin Rome v. Jim O'Sullivan


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000111195-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00389-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000141339]. Mailed to: Adrin Rome. [17-6791]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6791 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6791 ADRIN KENTRAL ROME, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JIM O'SULLIVAN, Sheriff of Chesapeake Jail; NURSE CORDOVA, Nurse of Chesapeake City Jail; NURSE MARTINEZ, Nurse for Chesapeake Jail; OFFICER CIPCIC, c.o/ Deputy; JOHN DOE, c.o/Deputy; NURSE MOSS, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00389-CMH-IDD) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adrin Kentral Rome, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: August 22, 2017 Appeal: 17-6791 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Adrin Kentral Rome appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rome’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Rome has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Rome’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?