US v. Webster Williams, III


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion to strike the Government s response [1000112427-2]; denying Motion to correct error [1000127728-2]. Originating case numbers: 4:12-cr-00969-RBH-1, 4:17-cv-00350-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000141306]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6794]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6794 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6794 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00969-RBH-1; 4:17-cv-00350RBH) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 22, 2017 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Webster Douglas Williams, III, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6794 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Webster Douglas Williams, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions for default judgment and to strike the Government’s response to Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Williams seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motions to strike the Government’s response and to correct error and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?