George Wayne Reid v. A. Mansukhani

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000120363-2] Originating case number: 5:16-cv-03280-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000145752]. Mailed to: George Wayne Reid FCI ESTILL FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 699 Estill, SC 29918-0699. [17-6797]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6797 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/29/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6797 GEORGE WAYNE REID, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:16-cv-03280-RMG) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Wayne Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6797 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/29/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: George Wayne Reid, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. Mansukhani, No. 5:16-cv-03280-RMG (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?