George Wayne Reid v. A. Mansukhani
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000120363-2] Originating case number: 5:16-cv-03280-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000145752]. Mailed to: George Wayne Reid FCI ESTILL FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 699 Estill, SC 29918-0699. [17-6797]
Appeal: 17-6797
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/29/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6797
GEORGE WAYNE REID,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A. MANSUKHANI, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:16-cv-03280-RMG)
Submitted: August 24, 2017
Decided: August 29, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Wayne Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States
Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6797
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/29/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
George Wayne Reid, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Reid v. Mansukhani, No. 5:16-cv-03280-RMG (D.S.C. June 1, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?