Larry James Tyler v. Sheriff Wayne Byrd
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to file informal brief [1000173204-2] Originating case number: 9:16-cv-01275-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Larry James Tyler DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 2349 Rogers Road Darlington, SC 29532-0000. [17-6810]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
LARRY JAMES TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SHERIFF WAYNE BYRD, Darlington Detention Center; CAPTAIN COE;
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (9:16-cv-01275-MGL)
Submitted: October 17, 2017
Decided: October 20, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry James Tyler, DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Darlington,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Samuel F. Arthur, III, James Rufus Bratton, III, AIKEN,
BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
The court granted Defendants Byrd and Coe’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissed the complaint as to Defendant Wilkes. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tyler v. Byrd, No. 9:16-cv-01275-MGL (D.S.C. June 19, 2017).
We grant Tyler’s
motion to file a supplemental informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?