William Pumphrey v. Joe Coakley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000140331-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000177542]. Mailed to: William Pumphrey. [17-6823]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6823 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/20/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6823 WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA) Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 20, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Pumphrey, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6823 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/20/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William C. Pumphrey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pumphrey’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pumphrey v. Coakley, No. 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 21, 2017). We further deny as moot Pumphrey’s motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?