William Pumphrey v. Joe Coakley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000140331-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000177542]. Mailed to: William Pumphrey. [17-6823]

Appeal: 17-6823

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/20/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6823

WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA)

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: October 20, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Pumphrey, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6823

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/20/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William C. Pumphrey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pumphrey’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pumphrey v. Coakley,
No. 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 21, 2017). We further deny as moot
Pumphrey’s motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2