US v. Victor Perkin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [1000141650-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000149669-2]; denying Motion for default judgment [1000156408-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [1000164819-2] Originating case number: 5:92-hc-00654-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000179297]. Mailed to: Victor Bernard Perkins. [17-6836]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6836 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6836 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. VICTOR PERKINS, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-BR) Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 24, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6836 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Victor Perkins appeals from the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to vacate the November 6, 1992, order committing him to the custody and care of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017). We also deny Perkins’ motions for summary disposition, to appoint counsel, for default judgment, and for bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?