US v. Eric Van Buren

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for leave to file a Rule (d) motion [1000165570-2] Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000179180]. Mailed to: E Van Buren. [17-6897]

Appeal: 17-6897

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC MARTIN VANBUREN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1)

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 24, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Martin Van Buren, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6897

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin VanBuren appeals the district court’s orders denying his most recent
attempts for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny VanBuren’s self-styled motion for leave to file a Rule (d)
motion and affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. VanBuren, No. 3:00-cr00066-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. June 27, 2017 & July 6, 2017).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2