US v. Maurice McKnight


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00063-TLW-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000163310]. Mailed to: Maurice Antwaun McKnight. [17-6899]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6899 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6899 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICE ANTWAUN MCKNIGHT, a/k/a Weezie, a/k/a Wee, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00063-TLW-1) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Antwaun McKnight, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6899 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Maurice Antwaun McKnight seeks to appeal the district court’s order disposing of the Government’s post-judgment motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order and, thus, dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?