Shan Carter v. John Sherrill


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000129525-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03272-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000166560]. Mailed to: Shan Carter. [17-6907]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6907 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6907 SHAN EDWARD CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN W. SHERRILL; BENJAMIN R. DAVID; JAY D. HOCKENBURY; KRISTIN D. PARKS; MARGARET T. CLOUTIER; WILLIAM H. DURHAM; ROY A. COOPER, III; PHYLLIS M. GORHAM; D. JACK HOOKS, JR.; SHERRI HORNER-LAWRENCE; GEORGE P. CORVIN; N.C. STATE BAR; N.C. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03272-D) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: October 3, 2017 Appeal: 17-6907 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Shan Edward Carter appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Sherill, No. 5:16-ct-03272-D (E.D.N.C. June 13 & July 17, 2017). We also deny Carter’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?