Shan Carter v. John Sherrill

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000129525-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03272-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000166560]. Mailed to: Shan Carter. [17-6907]

Appeal: 17-6907

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6907

SHAN EDWARD CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN W. SHERRILL; BENJAMIN R. DAVID; JAY D. HOCKENBURY;
KRISTIN D. PARKS; MARGARET T. CLOUTIER; WILLIAM H. DURHAM;
ROY A. COOPER, III; PHYLLIS M. GORHAM; D. JACK HOOKS, JR.;
SHERRI HORNER-LAWRENCE; GEORGE P. CORVIN; N.C. STATE BAR;
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03272-D)

Submitted: September 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: October 3, 2017

Appeal: 17-6907

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Shan Edward Carter appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Carter v. Sherill, No. 5:16-ct-03272-D (E.D.N.C. June 13 & July 17,
2017). We also deny Carter’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2