Richie Williams v. Gordon Willi

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to correct the record [1000129553-2], denying Motion to amend the complaint [1000136298-2]. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00173-CMH-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000166680]. Mailed to: Richie Leo Williams. [17-6919]

Appeal: 17-6919

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6919

RICHIE LEO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GORDON F. WILLIS, Circuit Court Judge; TARA BETH COLEMAN, Attorney;
FREDERICKSBURG CIRCUIT COURT; KEVIN D. GROSS, Assistant
Commonwealth Attorney; KING GEORGE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00173-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: September 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richie Leo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: October 3, 2017

Appeal: 17-6919

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richie Leo Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Williams v. Willis, No. 1:17-cv-00173-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va.
June 30, 2017). We also deny Williams’ motions to correct the record and to amend the
complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2