US v. Carlton Edward
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: C Edwards. [17-7098]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
CARLTON A. EDWARDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1)
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Carlton A. Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Edwards’
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
United States v. Edwards, No. 3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1 (E.D. Va.
July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?