Altony Brooks v. Sgt Davenport

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000170331-2]; denying Motion to reconsider [1000184379-2]. Originating case number: 9:15-cv-03195-PMD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000286654]. Mailed to: Altony Brooks; Samuel F. Arthur III. [17-7182]

Appeal: 17-7182

Doc: 22

Filed: 05/02/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7182

ALTONY BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT DAVENPORT; OFC LEDWELL; WARDEN STEVENSON; WARDEN
SUTTON; CAPTAIN PACK; LIEUTENANT CARTER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (9:15-cv-03195-PMD)

Submitted: March 19, 2018

Decided: May 2, 2018

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-7182

Doc: 22

Filed: 05/02/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to defendants, dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court, Brooks v. Davenport, No. 9:15-cv-03195-PMD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2016 &
Aug. 4, 2017), but modify the order granting summary judgment to reflect that dismissal
of all claims is without prejudice. We deny Brooks’ motions to appoint counsel and to
reconsider, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

2