US v. Robert Lee Pernell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000232304-2] Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00452-REP-DJN-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000259095]. Mailed to: Robert Pernell. [17-7366]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-7366 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/16/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7366 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT LEE PERNELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, Magistrate Judge. (3:09-cr-00452-REP-DJN-1) Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Pernell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-7366 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/16/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Pernell, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pernell’s motion to expedite as moot and affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. United States v. Pernell, No. 3:09-cr00452-REP-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?