Larry James Tyler v. James Bogle, Sr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion for the appeal to be heard on the original record [1000191032-2]; granting Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief [1000220855-2] Originating case number: 4:17-cv-01251-MGL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000302326]. Mailed to: Larry James Tyler DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 2349 Rogers Road Darlington, SC 29532-0000. [17-7386]
Appeal: 17-7386
Doc: 16
Filed: 05/29/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7386
LARRY JAMES TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES BOGLE, SR, Esq; JAMES K. FALK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01251-MGL)
Submitted: May 24, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry James Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 29, 2018
Appeal: 17-7386
Doc: 16
Filed: 05/29/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, grant Tyler’s
motion to file a supplemental brief, and deny as moot his Fed. R. App. P. 24(c) motion
for the appeal to be heard on the original record. Tyler v. Bogle, No. 4:17-cv-01251MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?