Marion Sherrod v. Colbert Respass


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for leave to file amended complaint [1000218995-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03252-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000338307]. Mailed to: M. Sherrod. [17-7469]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-7469 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/30/2018 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7469 MARION L. SHERROD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLBERT L. RESPASS; SEAN DILLARD; CAPTAIN OLIVER; MARCEL SLEDGE, Defendants - Appellees and GEORGE T. SOLOMON; FELIX TAYLOR; NURSE PATTERSON; RAHIM AKBAR; HIRAM BEASLEY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03252-FL) Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 17-7469 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/30/2018 Pg: 2 of 3 Marion L. Sherrod, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-7469 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/30/2018 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Marion L. Sherrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sherrod v. Respass, No. 5:14-ct-03252-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2017). We deny Sherrod’s motion to file an amended complaint, a motion more properly addressed to the district court, but have considered the material as a supplement to his informal brief. We deny Sherrod’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?