Marion Sherrod v. Colbert Respass
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for leave to file amended complaint [1000218995-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03252-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000338307]. Mailed to: M. Sherrod. [17-7469]
Appeal: 17-7469
Doc: 17
Filed: 07/30/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7469
MARION L. SHERROD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COLBERT L. RESPASS; SEAN DILLARD; CAPTAIN OLIVER; MARCEL
SLEDGE,
Defendants - Appellees
and
GEORGE T. SOLOMON; FELIX TAYLOR; NURSE PATTERSON; RAHIM
AKBAR; HIRAM BEASLEY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03252-FL)
Submitted: July 26, 2018
Decided: July 30, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 17-7469
Doc: 17
Filed: 07/30/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Marion L. Sherrod, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-7469
Doc: 17
Filed: 07/30/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Marion L. Sherrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sherrod v.
Respass, No. 5:14-ct-03252-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2017). We deny Sherrod’s motion to
file an amended complaint, a motion more properly addressed to the district court, but
have considered the material as a supplement to his informal brief. We deny Sherrod’s
request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?