Christopher Odom v. Director, Charleston County

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for initial hearing en banc [1000236105-2] Originating case number: 5:17-cv-01906-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000272636].. [17-7511]

Appeal: 17-7511

Doc: 17

Filed: 04/09/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7511

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:17-cv-01906-RMG)

Submitted: March 13, 2018

Decided: April 9, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-7511

Doc: 17

Filed: 04/09/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) proceeding. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Odom’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the court’s disposition, Odom has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th
Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Odom’s motion for initial en banc hearing, deny a
certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2