Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000220629-2]. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000259172]. Mailed to: Casey Luczak. [17-7583]
Appeal: 17-7583
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/16/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7583
MR. CASEY LUCZAK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: March 13, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Luczak, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: March 16, 2018
Appeal: 17-7583
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/16/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Casey Luczak, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Luczak v. Coakley, No. 3:17-cv-00086GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?