Joseph Pirela v. Jeff Atkin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:17-cv-00559-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000269550]. Mailed to: Joseph Pirela. [18-1025]
Appeal: 18-1025
Doc: 7
Filed: 04/03/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1025
JOSEPH PIRELA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFF ATKIN, Clerk of Court, Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 177M53 Appeal; ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, The
Congress of the United States of America; HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION OF
UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS, (Sex Workers Transvestites-Prostitutes);
ALOYMA SANCHEZ; JUDGE THOMAS WILLIAMS; MIAMI POLICE
DEPARTMENT;
THE STATE
OF
FLORIDA
PROCEEDINGS
PROSECUTIONS; UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS; TRANSVESTITES
UNKNOWN; SEX WORKERS 33 HEALTH CARE BAKER ACT OF JACKSON
HOSPITAL; (4) TRANSVESTITE MATTHEW JOHN, Prostitute Homosexual;
DAVID COUNTIN, (1) Client; DON SMITH; UNKNOWN TRANSVESTITE
BAR PROSTITUTE OF BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS UNKNOWN, (9); DENIS
FONSECA; ANGEL MIRANDA; CARLOS ALVAREZ; CITY OF MIAMI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00559-D)
Submitted: March 29, 2018
Decided: April 3, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 18-1025
Doc: 7
Filed: 04/03/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Joseph Pirela, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 18-1025
Doc: 7
Filed: 04/03/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirela v.
Atkin, No. 5:17-cv-00559-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?