Edward Richardson v. Priderock Capital Partners
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00940-LO-MSN,16-13482-BFK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000303727]. [18-1099]
Appeal: 18-1099
Doc: 28
Filed: 05/30/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1099
In re: EDWARD RICHARDSON,
Debtor.
--------------------------------------EDWARD RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRIDEROCK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,
Creditor - Appellee.
----------------------------------------NATIONAL CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY RIGHTS CENTER; NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS,
Amici Curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00940-LO-MSN)
Submitted: May 22, 2018
Decided: May 30, 2018
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Appeal: 18-1099
Doc: 28
Filed: 05/30/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Marino, REDMOND, PEYTON
& BRASWELL, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 18-1099
Doc: 28
Filed: 05/30/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Edward Richardson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy
court’s order denying his motion for civil sanctions against Priderock Capital Partners,
LLC. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Priderock Capital Partners,
LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00940-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 21, 2017 & entered Dec. 22,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?